ISO 20996 Revision Checker 40.60 Close of voting

Method

One record, a retrieval date on every field, and a diff on refresh

The method is deliberately boring. Read the official record, write down what it says with the date and the URL, read the baseline from the held rules, author the cloud-specific judgement in our own words, and make a script that fails when the source moves.

The five steps

  1. Read the official record. The ISO page for the draft is fetched and transcribed: status, stage, stage date, committee, classification, page count, price and the full lifecycle. Retrieved 2026-10-20.
  2. Export the baseline. The continuity clauses come from the held framework, not from memory. The export is preflighted for placeholders, shared evidence and named bodies; this build asserts zero of each across 57 clauses.
  3. Author the cloud judgement in our own words. For each clause, what the requirement means when the service is rented, and a test the customer can run. No sentence of the standard is reproduced; only clause titles and codes stay verbatim.
  4. Drive every output from the one file. The pages, the check, the kit, the sitemap and the markdown versions all read the same record, so a fix cannot leave one output disagreeing with another.
  5. Refresh and diff. A script re-downloads the ISO record, compares stage, date and lifecycle with the file, writes the result and exits non-zero on a change. The change is what the watch sends.

What is checked before publication

What is deliberately not stated

The clause list, the annexes and the requirement text of the draft. They are not public. A page that filled that gap would be inventing the standard, which is the one thing a record like this must never do. Read the note on Annex A.

The rules this is built from

Every requirement on this site is written from a held rule and points to the clause it came from. Nothing is invented while you wait.

How the record is made and where each source comes from. The continuity baseline is ISO 22301:2019, read here.